I'm cool with the flop stab, pretty decent board to do it on and ok hand as well with no showdown value but an overcard to middle pair. I think I would probably lead the turn if the stack sizes were any different: You want to get value out of 4x/7x and those hands are going to check back a lot, additionally, there aren't very many draws in his range for him to bluff. I think bet/fold about half pot would be a good option. You say you feel like you're ahead of the hand, but the vast majority of stuff you're behind against will check behind. The problem is that stack sizes are really awkward to do this with when he jams, you're not comfortable with calling or foldign really and for that reason I'm ok with c/c.As played, on the river, I'm still folding. I'm OK with your reasoning about how he doesn't have many value hands in his range, but he also has rather few bluff hands, mostly just T9o type floats on the flop with a small turn bet semi-bluff hoping to fold stuff on out the river. Because it's so short, he can be limping to trap as well, which puts more of those high diamonds in his range. As for the converter, try converting the whole hand then deleting the results after you do that.

I wouldn't get too leveled about it: if you call light, with the 82, I would expect him to bluff less often pretty much for sure in later hands.I would fold the turn. People like to do this a lot with ace-rag on drawy boards (you can even make a case for folding flop assuming this is a rare c-bet size!), and in my experience tilt-calling this versus regs like var1ance it doesn't usually work out very well.

In terms of your "weakest hands to flat" question, it depends a TON on postflop tendencies, but in general, some King-rag type stuff is an instant muck vs a 40% raiser and a call vs an 80% raiser. Some of the more lower/middling stuff (like 47s) actually plays pretty close to as well vs a 40% than an 80% raiser, so it really doesn't make a big difference. 96o is another hand that's a bit more middling that you can play vs an 80% raiser and fold easily vs a 40%er.

Definitely, keep not posting results.

pick an even more specific stack depth, but flat strong kings/queens/jacks/strong enough suited connectors and jam something like A8+ and any pair, against a frequent 3bettor it depends on how frequent but any ace can be good to jam.

http://www.handconverter.com/hands/1247185Your reasoning on the c/r size is good here, I think I would also fold, but probably get KT in (there obviously aren't a huge difference between those hands, so I do think it's fairly close). Against a c/r to 120 I'm continuing with basically any pair (not low pocket pairs which only have 2 outs to improve if he does have Ax, not 5) readless, usually flatting. I think people give up with their bluffs a decent amount but there's obviously merit to just going ahead and jamming.

http://www.handconverter.com/hands/1247191I would definitely call off the turn jam here and would be doing so with most of my flop continuing range, although it would also include some weaker straight draws (like 56) that have to fold. I still prefer call/call to 3betjamming the flop because it allows him to continue to spew with his air and there are turn cards we can fold on (Jc would be an awful card).

10bb and 8bb becomes really villain dependent, but in general hands that are good for raise/calling 12bb deep are still good for raise/calling 8-10bb deep, and then you just throw in however much kind of decent junk you feel you can get away with (unless limping is a better option).First hand I probably raise/call somehing like 33+, A8o+, A7s+, KQ. If I know the player 3bet jams wide, I'm calling something like 22+, A6o+, A2s+, KJ+.20bb deep, a standard range might look something like 22+, A7o+, A5s+, KJ, where vs a fairly wide jammer it migt be more like 22+, A5o+, A2s+, K9o+, QJs. 

"vs a 40% raiser: flat: A2+,K9+,K6s+,Q9+,Q8s+,J9+,J8s+,T8s+,98s,87s,76s 3bet to 100: TT+ (mix in some bluffs if you play them a lot & they actually catch on) 3bet to 120: KQ,KJs+" I don't see a shoving range here - AK is not a flat, but I think you just mistyped. Again, even against a 40%er, you can't fold T7s to a minraise, your ranges look too tight.   "Personally, I think 3bet reshoving at around 20-23bb or so is very underrated in HU STs.  I see people correctly adjust their flatting & 4bet ranges to a 100 re-raise but I never really see people correctly adjust their calling range to a wide 3bet reshoving range at 20-25bb.  You make the Phil Ivey references all the time in your videos (which I love), but I think that mindset is why people underrate 3bet reshoving.  It doesn't seem like you're playing some unexploitable super deep thinking strategy when you reship in 20bb w/ J3s vs an 80% opener, but I think it can very often be the best play."I think your last line is a great point - it's definitely in the category for some people of feeling like not great poker, even when the equity shows that it is. I'd just be careful about a few things:a) Make damn sure you actually know their opening range is that wide at that stack depth and that they aren't adjusting to your aggression. Most people will raise different percentages at different stack depths, and it's just human nature to stop raising so much if your opponent is jamming a lot, so it's also really easy to sit in your position as you get called off by AK and think "that's just unlucky, I know I made the right play, he was opening x%", when actually it wasn't a good play anymore.b) Make sure your expectation from jamming is also better than your expectation from flatting, but I read now you've watched my videos so I'm sure I've beat you over the head with that already.

Your reasoning/adjustments sound great! :) About A3o for 25bb...I got a bit jumbled up in my response, I think shoving it for 25bb is fine if you're sure he's raising 80% (thanks for using my own video to own me ;)). Just be careful with gameflow/sample size here.

Those are all going to be about -0.5bb type hands, imo. I just checked my historical expecation and that seems about right. 

Those are going to be pretty close to 0bb (KTo a little in the positive, JTo a little in the negative, same for Q9s/T8s).

Within a couple thousand games you're probably 90% for your EV adjusted ROI to be within 2% of your true ROI, probably 99% for 5000 games. Those are just educated guesses though.

"Let's say you've developed a limping range against an aggro 3bettor & you limp 14BBs.  What kind of hands are you calling a 3x with at this stack depth?  I think a hand like JTo is still an easy call here but how weak are we going?  Also, at what stack depth are you going to stop limp/calling these hands?"That's actually something I've been thinking a lot about recently. It depends on exactly how short, but I think T9o is fine to limp/call, 98o is probably a fold, but that line is pretty fuzzy. I stop limp/calling when it's correct to do something else but limp basically, Some of it depends on stack sizes, you can limp/call 96s for 18bb but not for 11bb, etc. 

"At around 12bb when a player is 3bet pushing wide AND pushing wide over limps, are you starting to push a lot more hands or raise/call a lot more hands?  Or both?  What hands are you adding to your raise/calling range?  How wide of a limp trapping range might you develop?"I'm definitely just jamming a lot of my T8o stuff instead of limp/folding a ton, K3o becomes more of a jam instead of messing around with other options, etc. I'm adding middling kings to my raise/calling range, K7 needs to be a raise/call instead of a limp, Q9o definitely a raise/call. It still makes a big difference what their flatting range is: If they have no flatting range there's no need to have an openshoving range. I think against most people it's best to have your trapping range your minraising range, most people do not spazz that much more over limps than minraises. AA and KK though I would limp though because we never mind seeing a flop with those and letting him hit a pair.

"You said in your bb endgame vid not to flat raises w/ <15bb unless your opponent is a nit & your hand flops well.  Obv we also make an exception vs total spewtards postflop.  It kind of seems like you've backed off this statement since & have been flatting a lot more at these stack depths.  Am I right?"You are right to some degree, I've been convinced off of this initial stance by a few really good players who do it a lot. I still think ig your opponent is raising an above average percentage, most of those flatting hands are better to jam. But against someone who is raising even just 45% and has a normal fairly wide calling range, our expectation from flatting with these hands that flop well is going to be pretty good and I think it's a real option.

"Otherwise, say you're playing a nit who opens something like 40% on the btn.  How wide are you flatting w/ about 14bb and at what stack depth do you stop flatting them?"Just going by my intuition, you can flat a lot of 98, T9-T7, J9/J8, Q8, K7 type hands, as well as some slightly weaker suited varieties, like 96s especially when gameflow would suggest you're getting induced a lot. I think once you get down somewhere in the range of 9-12bb if BTNs range is wide enough that it's worth playing them it's probably worth just jamming.

You won't still have access to the forum, iirc. Definitely feel free to copy/paste or print.

going through entire thread, and ima post my thoughts on some things said here, as i come up with em, becausee, if i wait till im finished and make one long post i might lose my train of thought (or we its called)