xSCWx Video 35 - Two $34.50s against Ooh A Donut! / Belrhiti R (Ooh A Donut!'s Perspective)

February 11, 2010 - 10:42

In this video Ooh A Donut plays two $33+1.50 games against xSCWx. This video supplements xSCWx Video 35. There is no commentary.
(8 votes)

plepormv says:
Hey, i think u played very decent.
1 hand i dont get tought is ur fold with 85dd on Txxdd, i thought it was a good stack size to just get it in there. Deeper i flat, but there what was ur tought process to just folding it
gg
belrhitir says:
Hi,
first of all thanks for the compliments! glad you enjoyed it.. :)
here is what I posted on the other videos (SCW's PoV):
"Hi there,
I folded because of the stack sizes indeed, If I had pair+fd or overcards+fd, i'll def 3bet/call or instant shove. ut I found this spot kind of meh, I prefered to fold here cuz I was going to luckbox after obv."
Ryan's answer:
"
Fri, 02/12/2010 - 14:40  xSCWx
I just looked up this hand. I think that folding the flush draw to a raise on that board is a huge mistake.
Call > Raise >>>>>>>>>>>Fold.
If you put me on a strong range like TX then your implied odds are good enough to be calling here. If you put me on a mixture of strong hands and bluffs then you still have really good implied odds and possibly even good enough direct odds to peel a card. Folding to a raise is way too weak."
And after reviewing and thinking about it, I was afraid of calling and getting stuck on turn with a total brick. But the straight redraw + FD could have been good.
But, well I still have to work !
DonNew says:
Just tried to watch this vid but seems like the audio is missing?
RyPac13 says:
I believe this is just the other vantage point from video 35 and does not contain commentary.
It's not totally clear though, I'll double check with xSCWx today though.
"n this video Ooh A Donut plays two $33+1.50 games against xSCWx. This video supplements xSCWx Video 35. There is no commentary."
DonNew says:
lol sorry didnt see the "no commentary", no problem.