Well explained thoughts, hope you'll be making others vids (specially  HT 30$-60$).

Thanks to husng for this free sample.

David

meh short :p

gave you some 5 stars love tho

Cool little free vid.

What range are you attacking limps with the 1st hand readless? and are you always making it that 3.5x or does it change with different hands?

Where in UK are you from? I can't make out your accent.

my range for attacking limps first hand readless would be a8+, k9+, QT+, JT, with maybe an extra kicker down if the hands are suited. 

I think 3.5x is best for this effective stack size, though I also think its ok to raise a little less with the weaker end of this range. The reason is a hand like QJ is a lot more likely to dominate a limp call range than a hand like AK (so less need to punish with sizing), and on top of this there are more profitable bluff/value boards when you rase a hand like QJ compared to a hand like AK, (for one instance you basically always win A high flops in these spots, so an A high flop with QJ is gong to be much better than a Q high flop with AK in terms of bluff value, and a top pair Queens is going to get a more value on avg than a top pair ace)

I'm from Devon in the UK so there should be a tinge of janner in there somewhere.

Thanks for answers.

Devon, that makes sense now. So is that pig in your avatar actually yours :)?

I wish the pig was mine, just an avatar I chose, primarily because I like bacon.

Will have more vids coming soon guys, including one focusing on reg on reg play in hypers and another where I'l be making use of some footage from my regular 4 table grind.

nice vid. keep 'em coming.

The way you play that last hand. The fact that he limp/called in position when you made it 3.5 times the bllind with ace jack 2 hands before you get the aces doesn't lead you to make a slightly bigger bet, thus making him a little more commited and therefor making it easier for you to get in in if you happen to go to a flop?

Also, are you really more worried about people folding their hand still, after they minraise you in position like that then you are about losing them after the flop if they decide to flat call? Personally I'm more worried about my opponent deciding to slow down, call the 180, miss the flop and fold where I could have had it in pre.

Not sure why I decided to watch it, but this was the first video I ever watched, it's a bit short imo. Your thoughtprocess is very clear though, I guess if I were trying to learn hypers I would want to see more, which is impressive considering how short the vid is.

This video was just short because it is a sample, they will be longer in future, at least 20 mins a piece.

In the case of the aces hand it I think my opponent was gettin it in almost all the time, I think against his value range I always get it in, so the reason i make the tiny bets is to also do well against the very few times he has air, if for some random reason he has 45o he's a lot more likely to call the min4bet than a 4bet shove, and with the pot to stack ratio postflop he has to stack off with any marginal equity on the flop. In the hand in isolation i don't think it makes any difference, but the main concept to note is that when we have a super lock on the hand you should always trying to play in a way that encourages your opponent to put in as much money as possible with their air range.

Given the flow of this game I think he's much more likely to be folding 4-5 after the flop if he decides to call your minraise then he is to fold 4-5 preflop if you shove. He obviously doesn't have a clue of what he is doing in general and is not getting away from any hand anymore when he has 120 invested already given his remaining chipstack. I'm not saying I'm not saying I'm right and you're wrong I'm just saying I believe strongly that my option is better ;)

RJ

yeh i think ur right too tbh, a shove prob is better in that spot

i always thought like RJRJ until the other day some fish did this in same spot and folded to a shove,.. theres definetely the 1% chance of happening :p , so now im in for chadders line!

I'm not saying there isn't a chance but the chances of him calling>missing>folding are bigger in my experience. Also I realize it's marginal but in hypers you do want to miss out on a chance to get it in ahead.

I agree with RJRJ