3 posts / 0 new
Last post
wkendhussler's picture
Bad move for begginer multi tabling ?

Hi there hoping for some feedback. Been playing hu hypers for a little while with ok results. It's obvious I make the best decisions when playing 1 table but of late I've Uped it to 2 tables to increase volume and even though I am playing well still I feel like I'm missing out on a few spots. As someone still studying and learning would it be better to just 1 table until I'm 100% comfortable  or will I learn still and pick it up eventually 2 tabling? Hope to get some answers thanks. 

coffeeyay's picture
I'm a strong believer that

I'm a strong believer that most--if not all--beginning players should 1 table. It enables you to learn faster while lowering your variance which lets you move up faster through the stakes. Adding more tables should be a priority once you reach a high enough level where you're making a comfortable hourly and want to increase it and the jump to the next level is very difficult--for example on PokerStars I would begin adding tables once you're beating the 30s comfortably but before you move up to 60s. Quality volume is much more profitable than high quantity, and moving up is more profitable than adding tables in the long run.

Disclaimer--not everyone is equal. Some people have trouble focusing on only 1 table and can sometimes benefit from two instead. That doesn't sound like it's the case for you.

wkendhussler's picture
Thanks

Thanks coffee yer I think I should be concentrating  on becoming better and moving up rather than thinking I have to multi table because that's what people do. Thanks again